"I keep almost all messages that are blocked for a few
hours to a day or so."
  - Cheshire -

===========================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wed, 05 Feb 2003, ATRU <fritz@rodent.frell.eu.org> wrote:
>Cheshire Admin <chadmin@bigfoot.com> wrote in
>news:92REJHJ237656.6194328704@anonymous.poster: 
>
>> I agree, which is why God knows what sort of rubbish passes
>> daily through the remailer. I wouldn't block it for the
>> world. 
>> 
>> In fact, if SB wants to post through Cheshire, he'll have
>> no problems, as long as his SB name isn't spelt out in the
>> body of the message. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> See Cheshire remailer stuff at:
>> http://cheshire.dyndns.org/remail/index.html
>
>Cheshire-Admin,
>
>I was a regular end-user of the previous incarnations
>of your remailer, with no problems. I valued it as a
>exit remailer for its support for "From" lines.
>
>However, in its current incarnation I've had a great
>deal of trouble gettting messages out of it, on apas
>and elsewhere. Even a nym configuration request with 
>Cheshire as the terminal remailer apparently hit the 
>bit bucket! At first I thought this might be due to 
>incorrect keys; however I've checked and a couple of
>days ago was able to send a test message to aam with
>Cheshire being the terminal remailer. So the keys aren't 
>the problem.
>
>My reply to Peter Palfrader in the thread: [A little OT]
>acronyms is the most recent example. Cheshire failed
>to deliver the message yesterday, I resent it with 
>Vayu as the last remailer today. You can read it and
>see if I'm somehow triggering some of your filters.
>Since I so infrequently post to apas, and since most 
>of my failures aren't here anyway, I have a hard time 
>how.
>
>If you'd like, I can set up a nym for this handle 
>and take the discussion to private e-mail.
>
>If, for whatever reason, you have decided to block
>me by my "handle" on apas or elsewhere, you can let 
>me know that too. I value remailers, and even though 
>I may agree/disagree with a particular remop's policies, 
>I can and still do such remailers as middlemen. To me, 
>the solution is more and better remailers; if we have 
>that, then users will have a wider choice of remop 
>"philosophies" from which to choose. You should run 
>Cheshire as you think best; and let we users choose
>from the remailer smorgasboard to taste.
>
>Thanks,
>
>ATRU

No, you aren't blocked, not deliberately, anyway. I keep almost all
messages that are blocked for a few hours to a day or so. Why don't
you send a message through the remailer to alt.test, with ATRU in the
subject line and including ATRU in the body? I'll check the bit
buckets to see if they are being caught by the filters. My initial
caps filter for apas would have caught ATRU as too many caps, but
that's been changed to something more reasonable, and it seems your
problem with Cheshire pre-dates that anyway.










See Cheshire remailer stuff at:
http://cheshire.dyndns.org/remail/index.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBPkBUAeaRa9bv1WjxAQGPSAgA1D6uwzqXED8GBIIaHm49p8o6CMcw62ZA
qIkQ/RqB5iI9DkihaHTUGkQGxDE27pKwBXEhWq05Ysz+8Nmp4GWYTmmWaHSNFenu
DCFG5f4fBz68QtGsvFiDR3Fk+WuLrn7G9rPZyEqilXfDA4yvXkEurCi5e09OhhmR
RJRDKZ0SiofvUTLZquxDvE2h58ifU34YpAYjvyFIVk1UBnfIsp1/n+HArS1bUslL
2/G3TQZ86t2lEiE1LYgJkmEKgVZatjhx9Yrw7jmyKOp7YxCTncNpZJCrTot2a4ck
p3t4RgeAj+W9DTaKZmPOuDbMX0DRd5ALAKhs8gvOiBguUwbnzJC7HQ==
=qd2K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----