http://www.google.com/groups?q=+eelbash+group:alt.privacy.anon-server&start=10&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&newwindow=1&safe=off&scoring=r&selm=679a6976b2358a05cf7dd9bf654cf7b4%40mixmaster.ceti.pl&rnum=12 From: Anonymous Remailer (Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]) Subject: Re: Eelbash's Publicly Made Intentions Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server Date: 2000-09-26 13:00:09 PST "Jiggs McManus" wrote in message news:7VMFW41J36787.8253240741@anonymous.poster... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On 18 Sep 2000, AnonymousAOLer wrote: > > >Once again, this WAS a signed post by Eelbash > > > I did not post any of this. > > > eelbash Admin I am reposting the original text (just in case the eelbash admin needs a reminder of what he wrote *and* signed on 7/6/00 6:14:17 PM.) Pay special attention to the first two paragraphs. In case eelbash is rightfully rejecting the message autheticity then it must be assumed the key is compromised. Take your pick: A lying remop or a remop with a knowingly compromised key. Eelbash speaking on 7/6/00: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- By the way, boys, I apologize in advance, but in throwing away the naughty French version of Reliable, and going back to the good old American version, I neglected to say that I make no representations as to the length of time that will pass before I again embrace the delectable French Reliable. If I see too many instances of nastiness showing up on the net, I may feel the need to jump back in and start monitoring again; blocking follows from that ('censorship' to the Shyster); and after that, making known the id of the scumbags responsible. It goes without saying that more sophisticated monitoring will follow: keyword searches of content; monitoring the input to the remailer, etc., etc. I can say that I will never jeopardize or invade the privacy of legitimate users, but people I suspect of being in the scumbag catergory, and it is I who must decide who is or is not a scumbag, have, in my humble opinion, no right to privacy: I will track them down like the skunks they are. And, yes, I think that content is something that must be looked at, and when it is found to fall into the scumbag category (according to my judgement), may and will be used to censor the post: I will not (I mean, possibly, and in the future) allow Eelbash to be used as a conduit for every species of filth). At the moment I don't have to tools to do the job properly: a keyword search program is needed, but when I do, the temptation to use it may be overwhelming. Please note that none of this is the case now: I am simply reserving the right to do it at some time in the future. Think about it: American society has become so degraded that 'motherfucker' is now a term of endearment! Unfortunately, the US seems to have a large influence on other Western countries, and I don't doubt that 'motherfucker' is also a term of endearment in many other nations, or is at least considered a benign word of greeting and reference. Do you want the remailers to be a part of this? Do you want to lie down with the lice and get lousy, or do you want to apply the bug spray of monitoring and censorship to destroy the little bastards? Even if you are one of the lice, remailers that follow such an irresponsible course will, eventually, bring down the wrath of the public and politicians, and end up legislated out of existence. Of course, remailers are klunky, and something like Publius, or WOF, will probaby soon replace them.; I'm not sure how they work, but have the feeling it will become more difficult for right-minded operators to do their good work. That will probably hasten the demise of Publius and WOF, along with all other remailers. My apolgies again for misleading you, perhaps. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: N/A iQCVAwUBOWUg2fsSw0UBaqY9AQGJHwP/Zapd3Lzlepg1wz1EgzQl0Hg21zVzKxBs 9qXW6gxsjKZ4Abt7BEAHGtbh7Jl702GmdnQkvTpjX9IUQnbhg2OCa6jseGHrEWcf /3akH5c4lh+2eB7/9zi09XDGMULb6xY4KpSDpRyl4N+wF51vnTLCisyB84TCSFE3 3L8OKAIUVKM= =sfof -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----